<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Xyre &#187; abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xyre.org/tag/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xyre.org</link>
	<description>Ancient writings, current events, and my other whims</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>A bit about the NARAL endorsement</title>
		<link>http://www.xyre.org/2008/05/14/a-bit-about-the-naral-endorsement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xyre.org/2008/05/14/a-bit-about-the-naral-endorsement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xyre.org/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NARAL, one of the largest and most influential pro-choice groups in the United States, has endorsed Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for President. Needless to say, this has set off quite a firestorm in certain circles—just scroll down the comments on the NARAL blog post announcing the endorsement to get a sense of some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.naral.org/">NARAL</a>, one of the largest and most influential pro-choice groups in the United States, has <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2008/05/naral-prochoice-6.html">endorsed Barack Obama</a> for the Democratic nomination for President. Needless to say, this has set off quite a firestorm in certain circles—just scroll down the comments on the NARAL blog post announcing the endorsement to get a sense of some of the reaction: some people appear to feel <em>personally</em> wronged by this endorsement, whining that they&#8217;ve been betrayed, vowing they&#8217;ll never contribute another dollar to NARAL, and so on and so forth—<em>ad nauseam</em>, actually. At Pandagon, Amanda Marcotte <a href="http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/14/7208/">hit the nail on the head</a>: &#8220;You’d think they endorsed, oh, McCain or someone anti-choice.&#8221;</p>
<p>This level of disappointment is perfectly ridiculous. Both Clinton and Obama are strong on choice, strong on women&#8217;s issues, and strong Democrats. Yet the race for the Democratic nomination has gone on <em>way</em> too long and is, thank goodness, almost over. The Democratic Party should start to corral its support and start the battle against McCain. Clinton <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/14/clinton/index.html">said</a> today that it would be a &#8220;terrible mistake&#8221; if voters chose McCain over Obama, a muted recognition of the fact that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/04/clinton-mccain-has-more-_n_89758.html">earlier comments</a> she made implying McCain&#8217;s preferability over Obama may not have been in the general interests of the party. And that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s really about at this point: the interests of a party that should be focussed on beating the other party. The Republican Party has been there for a while already; the Democratic Party is lagging far behind.</p>
<p>The astute reader will note that I have not said Clinton should drop out. On the contrary, there are several compelling reasons for Clinton to stay in the race, at least until the primary elections are over, the most convincing of which is that it would look extremely bad for Clinton to drop out and then win several of the remaining primaries, especially Kentucky, which she has been <a href="http://www.kypolitics.org/kypolitics/2008/02/obama-campaign.html">predicted</a> to win for a long time now. However, the Democrats <em>as a group</em> need to focus on what is going to bring victory to the party in November, and right now that means starting to coalesce behind <em>one</em> presidential candidate. NARAL&#8217;s endorsement is right in line with this, as is <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/14/edwards.obama/">John Edwards&#8217;s recent endorsement</a> of Obama. And if you&#8217;re a Clinton supporter who is too affected by the sour grapes of not being in a winning position, let alone not winning NARAL&#8217;s endorsement, <em>chill out</em>. It&#8217;s not personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xyre.org/2008/05/14/a-bit-about-the-naral-endorsement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Morgentaler Day, Canada!</title>
		<link>http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/26/happy-morgentaler-day-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/26/happy-morgentaler-day-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/26/happy-morgentaler-day-canada/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks twenty years since the Morgentaler decision in Canada, affirming a woman&#8217;s right to choose to have an abortion. As usual, Jill at Feministe has the whole story more eloquently and comprehensively than I could do.
Canada is very progressive in many ways, but, like most countries, it still has a long way to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Canada"><img class="imageright" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Flags-of-usa-and-canada.jpg" alt="flags of usa and canada" height="150" width="147" /></a>Today marks twenty years since the <em>Morgentaler</em> decision in Canada, affirming a woman&#8217;s right to choose to have an abortion. As usual, Jill at <em>Feministe</em> has <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/26/happy-20th-anniversary-pro-choice-canada/">the whole story</a> more eloquently and comprehensively than I could do.</p>
<blockquote><p>Canada is very progressive in many ways, but, like most countries, it still has a long way to go when it comes to abortion rights. To all the Canadians out there, I wish you a very happy anniversary — and best of luck in making next year even better.</p></blockquote>
<p>A heartfelt <em>amen</em> to that. <em>Feministe</em> is also linking to this <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080124.wpicard24/BNStory/specialScienceandHealth/home">article</a> from the <em>Globe and Mail</em>, highlighting the problems in the Canadian &#8216;choice&#8217; system—specifically, that there often <em>is</em> no choice, or at least that alternatives are scarce and treatment options are few, for hundreds of thousands of women: drug-induced abortion (think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mifepristone">RU-486</a>) isn&#8217;t even available in this country! This just blows my mind—you can buy Allegra and codeine over the counter here, but you can&#8217;t even get something a hundred times as essential by a doctor&#8217;s prescription. I can&#8217;t wait to see the web-based Canadian pharmacy companies illegally importing drugs from America to fill this void in the system.</p>
<p>So yeah. Both countries have a long way to go, it would appear. We are making progress, slowly, on the legal, ethical, and medical fronts, but it&#8217;s going to be a while before we can put this issue to bed, especially given how out of the spotlight abortion is in Canada, as compared to in the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/26/happy-morgentaler-day-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thirty-five years after Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/22/thirty-five-years-after-roe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/22/thirty-five-years-after-roe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/22/thirty-five-years-after-roe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, in the United States, is the thirty-fifth anniversary of the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade, which essentially held that women may elect to have an abortion for any reason up until the point when the fetus becomes &#8216;viable&#8217;. Ever since this ruling, social and religious conservatives have attempted to curtail [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, in the United States, is the thirty-fifth anniversary of the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade"><em>Roe v. Wade</em></a>, which essentially held that women may elect to have an abortion <em>for any reason</em> up until the point when the fetus becomes &#8216;viable&#8217;. Ever since this ruling, social and religious conservatives have attempted to curtail or even reverse this crucial right, and unfortunately have been seeing some successes in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States">various parts of the country</a> with measures like parental-notification laws, laws mandating waiting periods before the abortion may be carried out, and laws restricting particular kinds of abortion techniques.</p>
<p>Jill Filipovic has an excellent <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/22/blogging-for-choice-10-reasons-to-support-reproductive-justice-on-roe-day/">post</a> up at <em>Feministe</em>, which is also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jill-filipovic/10-reasons-to-support-rep_b_82633.html">posted</a> in the <em>Huffington Post</em>, outlining &#8216;10 Reasons to Support Reproductive Justice on Roe Day&#8217;. There&#8217;s nothing there I feel I can improve upon—just go read it. Also check out her <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/22/your-best-sources-for-roe-day-commentary/">roundup</a> of the best Roe Day commentary out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xyre.org/2008/01/22/thirty-five-years-after-roe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
